SkillCort

Solutions

Hire support agents who can do the work.

SkillCort puts candidates in a realistic support queue — ticket simulations, difficult-customer scenarios, and short written cases — so you see tone, accuracy, prioritization, and resolution quality before you hire.

Test the work candidates will actually do, not their test-taking.

Great support is hard to spot on a CV.

Contact centers hire at volume, but resumes and interviews rarely reveal whether someone can stay calm with a frustrated customer, prioritize a busy queue, and write a clear, accurate response.

  • Empathy and tone don't show on a resume
  • Interviews miss real queue pressure
  • High volume makes consistent screening hard
  • Bad hires drive churn and rework

Put candidates in a realistic support queue.

Reproduce the actual work with structured tasks, then score every response against the same rubric.

Ticket simulations

Candidates respond to realistic inbound tickets so you see tone, accuracy, and resolution quality.

Work sample tasks

Difficult-customer scenarios

Branching scenarios reveal how candidates de-escalate and handle pressure.

Short written cases

Open-ended cases show judgment and clarity that a multiple-choice item can't.

Prioritization across a queue

See how candidates triage and sequence work when several tickets compete for attention.

Consistent rubric scoring

Every response is scored against shared criteria for comparable evidence at volume.

Skill & Task Bank

Decision-ready comparison

Compare candidates side by side and build a shortlist your team can defend.

Decision Board

The skills that make support work.

Capture evidence of the competencies that predict on-the-job performance in service roles.

Measured skills

  • Written communication
  • Empathy
  • Resolution quality
  • Prioritization
  • Accuracy

Example tasks

  • Ticket response
  • Difficult-customer scenario
  • Short written case

Expected output

  • Skill evidence
  • Rubric scores
  • Decision-ready comparison

Example assessment flow.

A lightweight, candidate-friendly flow that turns a support queue into comparable evidence.

  1. Define the role

    Support agent competency map and seniority.

  2. Select skills

    Communication, empathy, prioritization, accuracy.

  3. Assign tasks

    Ticket response, difficult-customer scenario, written case.

  4. Score with rubrics

    Rate tone, accuracy, and resolution quality.

  5. Apply integrity

    Proportional checks, sized to the role's stakes.

  6. Compare and decide

    Shortlist on evidence, with rationale recorded.

Evidence you can hire on, at volume.

Each candidate's responses become comparable, rubric-scored evidence — so high-volume hiring stays consistent and every decision is grounded in real performance.

  • Tone and accuracy captured per response
  • Consistent scoring across many candidates
  • Side-by-side comparison and role-fit
  • Risk flags as context, never auto-reject
  • Lower mis-hire and early churn risk
  • Audit-ready record for every decision
A single integrity signal never disqualifies a candidate. People review every flag.

Frequently asked questions

Yes. Tasks run in the browser with a clear preflight, progress, and completion experience designed to keep the candidate flow accessible and low-friction.

Hire support talent on real service work.

Put candidates in a realistic queue and turn their performance into clear, comparable evidence.